INTRODUCTION

Severe infections, including sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and severe viral illnesses, remain major causes of global morbidity and mortality, particularly in critically ill patients, with reported mortality rates exceeding 20–25% in intensive care settings [1,2]. Despite advances in antimicrobial therapy and critical care management, outcomes remain suboptimal, largely due to dysregulated host immune responses characterized by a complex interplay between hyperinflammation and immunosuppression [3]. This persistent challenge highlights the need to explore novel biological systems that critically influence the host defense mechanisms in fish. The gut microbiota, increasingly recognized as the “second genome,” plays a fundamental role in shaping systemic immunity through continuous interactions with host immune cells [4]. Under physiological conditions, a diverse microbial ecosystem maintains intestinal barrier integrity, regulates immune tolerance, and produces bioactive metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), bile acids, and tryptophan derivatives [5]. These metabolites exert profound immunomodulatory effects by promoting regulatory T cell differentiation, enhancing epithelial defense, and maintaining immune homeostasis [6].

In contrast, critical illness induces profound disruptions in gut microbial composition, commonly referred to as dysbiosis. This state is characterized by a loss of microbial diversity, depletion of beneficial commensal organisms, and overgrowth of opportunistic pathogens, particularly Proteobacteria [7,8]. The contributing factors include broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure, altered enteral nutrition, and systemic inflammation. Mechanistically, dysbiosis compromises epithelial barrier integrity, leading to increased intestinal permeability and microbial translocation, which subsequently amplifies systemic inflammatory responses and contributes to multi-organ dysfunction [9,10]. Recent studies have further emphasized the role of gut–organ crosstalk in severe infections, particularly along the gut–lung, gut–brain, and gut–kidney axes, where microbiota-derived signals influence distant organ function and disease progression [11,12]. Clinical evidence consistently demonstrates that reduced microbiome diversity and specific dysbiotic patterns are associated with worse outcomes, including increased mortality and prolonged intensive care unit stay [13]. However, despite accumulating evidence, the precise mechanistic pathways linking microbiota alterations to host immune dysregulation remain incompletely understood, and translation into targeted therapies is still evolving [4,6]. Therefore, this review aims to critically examine the role of the gut microbiota as a key modulator of host immune responses in severe infections, integrating mechanistic insights, clinical evidence, and emerging therapeutic strategies. By bridging fundamental microbiome science with clinical applications, this study aims to advance the development of microbiome-based precision medicine in critical care.

METHOD

This study was conducted as a comprehensive narrative review aimed at synthesizing the current evidence on the role of the gut microbiota in modulating host immune responses in severe infections. A mechanistic and translational framework was adopted to integrate the findings from experimental, clinical, and emerging therapeutic studies to ensure a critical and concept-driven synthesis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, from inception to March 2026, to identify relevant studies. The search strategy used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) together with relevant free-text keywords such as gut microbiota, microbiome, dysbiosis, sepsis, severe infections, immune response, and critical illness. These terms were combined using Boolean operators to ensure the optimal sensitivity and specificity of the search. In addition, the reference lists of relevant studies and high-impact review articles were manually screened to identify further eligible publications.

Studies were included if they examined the role of gut microbiota or microbiome-derived metabolites in severe infections, explored the underlying mechanisms of immune modulation, or evaluated microbiome-targeted therapeutic strategies for severe infections. Preclinical studies, including animal and in vitro research, and clinical studies, including observational studies, randomized controlled trials, and systematic reviews were considered. Publications not written in English, conference abstracts without full-text availability, and studies lacking clear mechanistic or clinical relevance were excluded. Titles and abstracts were screened for relevance, followed by a full-text assessment of eligible studies. The extracted data included the study design, population characteristics, microbiota-related findings, immune pathways involved, and clinical outcomes. We focused on identifying the mechanistic links between microbiota alterations and host immune responses.

The included studies were critically appraised based on their methodological rigor, sample size, and translational relevance. Evidence was synthesized using a thematic approach, focusing on key mechanistic pathways, gut–organ interactions, and therapeutic implications. Particular emphasis was placed on studies employing multi-omics approaches, including metagenomics, metabolomics, and transcriptomics, to enhance mechanistic interpretation.

RESULTS

Current evidence demonstrates that the gut microbiota plays a central and dynamic role in modulating host immune responses in severe infections through interconnected mechanisms involving microbial dysbiosis, immune regulation, and systemic inflammatory amplification. Across experimental and clinical studies, three major domains have consistently emerged, highlighting the mechanistic and clinical relevance of microbiome alterations in critically ill patients. First, dysbiosis is a hallmark of severe infections and critical illnesses. This condition is characterized by a profound reduction in microbial diversity, depletion of beneficial commensal taxa such as Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, and expansion of opportunistic pathogens, particularly Proteobacteria. Mechanistically, these alterations compromise intestinal barrier integrity, leading to increased permeability and microbial translocation into the systemic circulation of the host.

Table 1. Gut Microbiota Alterations and Clinical Impact in Severe Infections

Study Population Key Microbiota Change Mechanistic Effect Clinical Outcome
Ojima et al. ICU Reduced diversity Barrier disruption, inflammation Increased mortality
Zaborin et al. Critical illness Pathogen dominance Loss of colonization resistance Prolonged ICU stay
Schuijt et al. Experimental Microbiota depletion Impaired immune defense Increased infection severity
Haak et al. Sepsis Dysbiosis Immune dysregulation Poor outcomes

This process amplifies systemic inflammation through the release of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, contributing to immune dysregulation and multi-organ dysfunction. Second, microbiota-derived metabolites are critical mediators of immune system homeostasis. Short-chain fatty acids, bile acids, and tryptophan-derived metabolites regulate epithelial integrity and modulate immune cell differentiation, particularly of regulatory T cells, and inflammatory pathways. In dysbiotic states, depletion of these metabolites results in impaired immune tolerance, exaggerated inflammatory responses, and disruption of epithelial defense mechanisms, further exacerbating disease severity.

Table 2. Microbiota-Derived Metabolites and Immune Regulation

Metabolite Source Key Mechanism Immune Effect
Short-chain fatty acids Fiber fermentation Enhance barrier, regulate T cells Anti-inflammatory
Bile acids Microbial metabolism Modulate immune signaling Immune homeostasis
Tryptophan metabolites Microbial metabolism Activate aryl hydrocarbon receptor Immune regulation

These microbiota alterations translate into clinically significant outcomes, as consistently demonstrated in previous human studies. Third, clinical evidence shows that reduced microbiome diversity and specific dysbiotic patterns are strongly associated with adverse outcomes, including increased mortality, prolonged intensive care unit stay, and higher susceptibility to secondary infections.

Table 3. Microbiome-Targeted Therapeutic Strategies in Severe Infections

Intervention Mechanism Evidence Limitation
Probiotics Restore microbial balance Reduced ICU infections Variable efficacy
Fecal microbiota transplantation Rebuild microbial diversity Promising early outcomes Safety concerns
Antibiotic stewardship Preserve commensal microbiota Improved microbiome stability Implementation variability
Emerging therapies Target microbiome pathways Early-stage evidence Limited clinical data

Emerging evidence highlights the importance of gut–organ interactions, particularly along the gut–lung, gut–brain, and gut–kidney axes, where microbiota-derived signals influence distant organ function and contribute to disease progression and organ-specific dysfunctions. In addition to mechanistic insights, microbiome-targeted therapeutic strategies have been explored to restore microbial homeostasis and improve the clinical outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The present review highlights the gut microbiota as a central and dynamic regulator of host immune responses in severe infections, extending beyond passive bystanders to active drivers of disease progression. These findings underscore that dysbiosis is not merely a consequence of critical illness but a mechanistic contributor to immune dysregulation and multi-organ dysfunction in critically ill patients. This concept reinforces the long-standing hypothesis that the gut acts as the “motor” of sepsis, where disruption of intestinal homeostasis initiates and perpetuates systemic inflammation [14,15]. Mechanistically, the loss of microbial diversity and depletion of beneficial commensal taxa profoundly alter immune homeostasis. Commensal-derived metabolites, particularly short-chain fatty acids, bile acids, and tryptophan derivatives, are essential for maintaining epithelial integrity and regulating immune tolerance by modulating T cell differentiation and inflammatory signaling pathways [16,17]. Their depletion in dysbiotic states shifts the host immune response toward a pro-inflammatory phenotype, characterized by exaggerated cytokine production and impaired regulatory mechanisms. This imbalance contributes to the paradoxical coexistence of hyperinflammation and immunosuppression in severe infections [18]. Importantly, the concept of gut–organ crosstalk provides a unifying framework linking local intestinal dysregulation to systemic organ dysfunction. Evidence from experimental and clinical studies has demonstrated that the gut microbiota influences distant organs through the gut–lung, gut–brain, and gut–kidney axes [19,20]. For instance, disruption of the gut microbiota impairs alveolar macrophage function and increases susceptibility to pulmonary infections, while also contributing to neuroinflammation and sepsis-associated encephalopathy [21,22]. Similarly, alterations in gut-derived metabolites and barrier integrity have been implicated in the pathogenesis of acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis [23,24]. These findings emphasize that microbiota-mediated immune modulation operates at the systemic level and affects multiple organ systems simultaneously. From a clinical perspective, the consistent association between microbiome alterations and adverse outcomes highlights the potential of the gut microbiota as both a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target. Reduced microbial diversity and pathogen-dominant profiles have been linked to increased mortality, prolonged intensive care unit stays, and a higher risk of secondary infection [25,26]. However, despite strong associative data, causality remains difficult to establish because of confounding factors inherent in critically ill populations, including antibiotic exposure and underlying comorbidities [27].

Microbiome-targeted interventions are promising therapeutic strategies. Probiotics and synbiotics have demonstrated potential in reducing infection rates in selected populations, although their efficacy remains inconsistent because of heterogeneity in the study design and microbial strains [28]. Fecal microbiota transplantation represents a more direct approach to restoring microbial diversity, with encouraging early results; however, concerns regarding safety, donor selection, and regulatory frameworks limit its widespread application [29]. Antibiotic stewardship is a fundamental strategy for preserving microbiome integrity, emphasizing the importance of minimizing unnecessary antimicrobial exposure [30]. Emerging approaches, including engineered microbiota, postbiotics, and microbiome-based precision therapies, represent a new frontier but require robust clinical validation [31]. Despite these advances, several critical gaps remain. Most available evidence is derived from observational studies and preclinical models, limiting the ability to establish causal relationships between microbiota alterations and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, heterogeneity in microbiome assessment techniques and the lack of standardized methodologies hinder comparability across studies. Future research should focus on integrating multi-omics approaches, including metagenomics, metabolomics, and transcriptomics, to provide a comprehensive understanding of host–microbiome interactions. Longitudinal studies are also essential to elucidate the dynamic changes in microbiota during the course of critical illness and their relationship with disease progression and recovery [32].

Collectively, these findings support a paradigm shift in the understanding of severe infections, in which the gut microbiota is recognized as a key determinant of host immune response and clinical outcomes. Integrating microbiome science into critical care practice holds significant potential for improving risk stratification, guiding therapeutic interventions, and advancing microbiome-based precision medicine.

CONCLUSION

The gut microbiota is a central regulator of host immune responses during severe infections, linking intestinal dysregulation to systemic inflammation and to organ dysfunction. Dysbiosis not only reflects disease severity but also actively drives immune imbalance through disruption of epithelial barrier integrity and depletion of key immunoregulatory metabolites. Emerging evidence highlights the role of gut–organ crosstalk in amplifying disease progression in multiple systems. Although microbiome-targeted interventions, such as probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and antibiotic stewardship, show promise, their clinical application remains limited by heterogeneous evidence. Future research should prioritize mechanistic studies and well-designed clinical trials to establish effective and safe treatment strategies for this condition. Ultimately, targeting the gut microbiota represents a promising strategy for improving outcomes and advancing precision medicine in critical care.

DECLARATIONS

None

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

The Authors agree to the publication in the Journal of Society Medicine.

FUNDING

None

COMPETING INTERESTS

All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to its publication in the Journal of Society Medicine.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

AC conceptualized and designed the study, conducted the literature search, performed the data synthesis, and drafted the manuscript. SW contributed to the critical interpretation of the data, provided intellectual input, and revised the manuscript for its important scientific content. KR contributed to the data validation, methodological refinement, and critical revision of the manuscript. All the authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors acknowledge the support of the respective clinical departments and institutions involved in this study. No external assistance was received for the preparation of this manuscript.

REFERENCE

  1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) criteria were used. JAMA. 2016;315(8):801-810.

  2. Prescott HC, Angus DC, Iwashyna TJ, Dantes RB, Finelli L, Rhee C, et al. Enhancing recovery from sepsis: A review. JAMA. 2018;319(1):62-75.

  3. Hotchkiss RS, Monneret G, Payen D, Roberts MB, Henderson WR, Sherwood ER, et al. Sepsis-induced immunosuppression. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(12):862-874.

  4. Belkaid Y, Hand TW, Harrison OJ, Jiang L, Loke P, McCoy KD, et al. Role of microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014;157(1):121-141.

  5. Koh A, De Vadder F, Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Bäckhed F, Tremaroli V, Caesar R, et al. From dietary fiber to host physiology: Short-chain fatty acids as key bacterial metabolites. Cell. 2016;165(6):1332-1345.

  6. Tan J, McKenzie C, Potamitis M, Thorburn AN, Mackay CR, Macia L, et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids in health and disease. Adv Immunol. 2014;121:91-119.

  7. Ojima M, Motooka D, Shimizu K, Gotoh K, Shintani A, Yoshiya K, et al. Metagenomic analysis revealed dynamic changes in the whole gut microbiota in ICU patients. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34535.

  8. Zaborin A, Smith D, Garfield K, Quensen J, Shakhsheer B, Kade M, et al. Membership and behavior of pathogen communities in the gut of patients in the ICU. mBio. 2014;5(5):e01361-14.

  9. Haak BW, Wiersinga WJ, Prescott HC, Angus DC, van der Poll T, Schultz MJ, et al. The role of gut microbiota in sepsis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(2):135-143.

  10. Dickson RP, Singer BH, Newstead MW, Falkowski NR, Erb-Downward JR, Standiford TJ, et al. The microbiome and critical illnesses. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4(1):59-72.

  11. Dang AT, Marsland BJ, Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Yadava K, Sichelstiel AK, et al. Microbes, metabolites, and gut–lung axis. Mucosal Immunol. 2019;12(4):843-850.

  12. Martín-Loeches I, Levy MM, Artigas A, Salluh JI, Levy B, Wiersinga WJ, et al. Gut microbiota and sepsis-associated encephalopathy. Front Neurosci. 2025;19:1596467.

  13. Liu Z, Li N, Fang H, Chen L, Zhang Y, Cao T, et al. Enteric dysbiosis is associated with sepsis outcomes. Crit Care. 2019;23:191.

  14. Deitch EA, Xu D, Kaise VL, Berg RD, Specian RD, Granger DN, et al. The role of intestinal barrier dysfunction in sepsis. Shock. 2012;38(1):12-17.

  15. Klingensmith NJ, Coopersmith CM, May AK, Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. The gut as a motor of multiple organ dysfunction. Crit Care Clin. 2016;32(2):203-212.

  16. Buffie CG, Pamer EG, Taur Y, Xavier JB, Pamer EG, Littman DR, et al. Microbiota-mediated colonization resistance. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(11):790-801.

  17. Furusawa Y, Obata Y, Fukuda S, Endo TA, Nakato G, Takahashi D, et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces regulatory T-cells. Nature. 2013;504:446-450.

  18. Hotchkiss RS, Moldawer LL, Opal SM, Reinhart K, Turnbull IR, Vincent JL. Parallels between cancer and infectious diseases. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:380-383.

  19. Schuijt TJ, Lankelma JM, Scicluna BP, de Sousa e Melo F, Roelofs JJ, de Boer JD, et al. The gut microbiota plays a protective role in pneumococcal pneumonia. Gut. 2016;65(4):575-583.

  20. Brown RL, Sequeira RP, Clarke TB, Dickson RP, Erb-Downward JR, Huffnagle GB, et al. The microbiota protects against respiratory infections. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(6):382-394.

  21. Sharon G, Sampson TR, Geschwind DH, Mazmanian SK, Hsiao EY, Borre YE, et al. The central nervous system (CNS) and gut microbiome. Cell. 2016;167(4):915-932.

  22. Cryan JF, O’Mahony SM, Dinan TG, Clarke G, Scully P, Sweeney J, et al. The microbiome-gut-brain axis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:701-712.

  23. Yang T, Richards EM, Pepine CJ, Raizada MK, Li HB, Zhao L, et al. Gut microbiota and kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018;14(7):442-456.

  24. Zhang L, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Shi H, Yang T, Wang X, et al. Gut microbiota and septic acute kidney injury. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:985283.

  25. McDonald D, Ackermann G, Khailova L, Baird C, Heyland D, Kozar R, et al. Extreme dysbiosis of the microbiome in ICU patients. mSphere. 2016;1(4):e00199-16.

  26. Lankelma JM, van Vught LA, Belzer C, Schultz MJ, van der Poll T, Wiersinga WJ, et al. Reduced microbiome diversity in critically ill patients. Microbiome. 2017;5:1-11.

  27. Ianiro G, Tilg H, Gasbarrini A, Cammarota G, Bibbò S, Gasbarrini G, et al. Antibiotics as modulators of the gut microbiota. Gut. 2016;65:1906-1915.

  28. Wischmeyer PE, McDonald D, Knight R, et al. Role of probiotics in critical illness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016;22(4):347-353.

  29. Khanna S, Tosh PK, Pardi DS, Kelly CR, Kassam Z, Fischer M, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(1):107-114.

  30. Dethlefsen L, Relman DA, Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huse SM, Welch DM, et al. Incomplete recovery of the microbiota after antibiotic treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:4554-4561.

  31. Mimee M, Citorik RJ, Lu TK, Hasty J, Silver PA, Collins JJ, et al. Microbiome therapeutics. Science. 2016;352(6285):1199-1200.

  32. Integrative HMP Research Network Consortium, Lloyd-Price J, Abu-Ali G, Huttenhower C, Segata N, Waldron L, et al. The Integrative Human Microbiome Project. Nature. 2019;569:641-648.