Response-Guided Low-Temperature Radiofrequency Ablation Without Escalation Above 60°C for Trigeminal Neuralgia: Two Case Reports
Abstract
Introduction: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an established interventional treatment for trigeminal neuralgia refractory to pharmacotherapy. Conventional protocols often escalate the temperature stepwise to 70–80°C; however, higher temperatures increase the risk of sensory complications. Whether selected patients can achieve pain control without escalation above 60°C remains clinically relevant.
Case Description: We report two patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia of the mandibular (V3) division treated using a response-guided, low-temperature, fluoroscopy-guided RFA strategy. A 58-year-old man (baseline Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] 8) received two lesions at 50°C for 60 seconds each; a 63-year-old woman (baseline NRS 10) received two lesions at 60°C for 60 seconds each. Both had persistent pain despite paracetamol and pregabalin. Needle placement through the foramen ovale toward Meckel's cave was confirmed fluoroscopically, with sensory and motor testing. Both patients achieved complete pain relief immediately after the procedure (NRS 0), sustained at the three-month follow-up, without corneal complications, dysesthesia, motor deficits, or other adverse events.
Conclusion: Response-guided low-temperature RFA without escalation above 60°C may provide effective short-term pain relief in selected patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia while minimizing unnecessary thermal exposure to healthy tissues. Prospective studies are needed to define the optimal patient selection, temperature, and long-term durability.
Keywords: Case Reports, Radiofrequency Ablation, Trigeminal Neuralgia, Treatment Outcome
Downloads
- 1. Cruccu G, Di Stefano G, Truini A. Trigeminal neuralgia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(8):754-762.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2. Xu R, Xie ME, Jackson CM. Trigeminal neuralgia: current approaches and emerging interventions. J Pain Res. 2021;14:3437-3463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3. Wu Z, Zhao Y, Liu J, Fan Y, Yang Y. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency thermocoagulation with percutaneous balloon compression for treating trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1178335.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4. Cosman ER Jr, Dolensky JR, Hoffman RA. Factors that affect radiofrequency heat lesion size. Pain Med. 2014;15(12):2020-2036.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5. Hong T, Ding Y, Yao P. Long-term efficacy and complications of radiofrequency thermocoagulation at different temperatures for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Biochem Res Int. 2020;2020:3854284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6. Yao P, Deng YY, Hong T, Wang ZB, Ma JM, Zhu YQ, et al. Radiofrequency thermocoagulation for V2/V3 idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: effect of treatment temperatures on long-term clinical outcomes. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(26):e4019.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7. Budisulistyo T, Arlina Y. Single cycle, low temperature radiofrequency ablation for trigeminal neuralgia shows clinical improvement of pain. Anaesth Pain Intensive Care. 2022;26(5):669-673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8. Rahmah Evelin Lubis, Diza Tanzira, Nurhakiki Zahara Arif. Cardiovascular Disease with COVID-19 in Rural Area: Case Series. Journal of Society Medicine. 2023;2(6), 214-218.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9. Khansa Salsabila, Puji Pinta Omas Sinurat, Irina Kemala Nasution. Association between Coagulation Profile and Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio with Karnofsky Performance Status Scale In Brain Tumor Patients. Journal of Society Medicine. 2023;2(5), 155-163.PubMedGoogle Scholar